Kabir, a resilient student facing locomotor disability, has been a shining example of determination and academic excellence. Despite his physical challenges, he completed his Class X with an impressive 91.5% and Class XII with 90%, nurturing a long-held dream of becoming a doctor. His ambition was fueled by a belief in the nobility of the medical profession and a desire to contribute meaningfully to society.
In 2024, Kabir registered for the National Eligibility-cum-Entrance Test (NEET) as a Scheduled Caste-Person with Disabilities (SC-PwD) candidate. His efforts culminated in securing 542 out of 720 marks, placing him well above the cut-off for his category. However, the next step in the admission process required him to obtain a NEET Disability Certificate from a designated center.
Kabir approached Vardhman Mahavir Medical College - Safdarjung Hospital (VMMC-SJ Hospital), where his disability was assessed at 68%. However, despite being within the permissible disability range, the Medical Board concluded that he was ineligible for medical studies. This unexpected verdict prompted Kabir to seek justice in court, arguing that his disqualification not only hindered his dreams but also violated his rights to equality and non-discrimination under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.
The case raised critical questions about the criteria used to evaluate the eligibility of candidates with disabilities in medical education. Kabir contended that the assessment did not consider his functional abilities, nor did it reflect the modern shift towards Competency-Based Medical Education (CBME), which emphasizes the competencies required to practice medicine rather than physical limitations.
The National Medical Commission (NMC) maintained that guidelines disqualifying Kabir were based on established regulations. On hearing the arguments, the court directed the formation of an independent Medical Board at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) to reassess Kabir’s condition. Despite the hopes pinned on this evaluation, the Medical Board concluded that Kabir’s disability would indeed impede his ability to fulfill the demanding requirements of an MBBS program.
The court, while acknowledging Kabir’s commendable academic achievements and spirit, upheld the Medical Board’s findings. It emphasized the importance of expert evaluations in determining eligibility criteria for medical education, recognizing that the rigorous nature of medical training necessitates certain physical capabilities.
Despite the unfavorable ruling, the court expressed a desire for Kabir not to lose heart. It highlighted the potential for future policies to accommodate candidates with disabilities in medical education, suggesting that advancements in medical training may open new avenues for individuals like Kabir.
The court's decision ultimately underscores the challenges faced by aspiring medical students with disabilities. While Kabir’s journey reflects the struggle for equal opportunities, it also highlights the need for a more inclusive approach in educational policies that can adapt to the evolving landscape of medical training.
In conclusion, Kabir’s story serves as an inspiration, illustrating that perseverance and hard work are paramount, even when faced with barriers. The legal outcomes of his case may not have aligned with his aspirations this year, but his determination signals a beacon of hope for many in similar circumstances, advocating for a future where dreams can be realized regardless of physical limitations.
RIGHTS OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, 2016
