The State of Uttar Pradesh challenged a judgment from April 2022 that stemmed from a batch of writ petitions. The Division Bench had merely expressed agreement with the single judge's findings without articulating any reasons for its decision. This lack of clarity prompted the State's counsel, Ms. Garima Prashad, to argue that several Government Orders (G.Os.) relevant to the case had not been adequately considered. She highlighted that subsequent developments, including additional appointments made by the State, further complicated the legal landscape.

The Supreme Court found the absence of reasoning in the Division Bench's judgment unsustainable. Drawing on established legal principles, the Court emphasized that every litigant has a legitimate expectation to understand the rationale behind judicial decisions. The Court quoted previous judgments, asserting that reasoned judgments are fundamental to ensuring justice and clarity in the legal process.

The Court's observations underscored the principle that a reasoned judgment serves multiple purposes: it clarifies the judicial process, informs the parties involved, and provides a solid foundation for any appellate review. Without this critical component, the integrity of the legal system is compromised, leading to confusion and dissatisfaction among litigants.

In light of these findings, the Supreme Court remanded the case back to the Division Bench, granting the parties the opportunity to present their arguments anew. This decision not only restores the appeal to its original position but also allows for the inclusion of subsequent developments, ensuring that the Division Bench can take a comprehensive view of the case.

The Court also encouraged expedited hearings to facilitate a timely resolution, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of all issues raised, particularly in light of recent appointments and governmental actions.

This case serves as a reminder of the essential role that reasoned judgments play in the judicial system. As the Supreme Court pointed out, clarity in legal reasoning enhances public confidence in justice and ensures that litigants can adequately prepare for appeals. Moving forward, both the parties involved and the judiciary must prioritize transparency to uphold the rule of law and the principles of justice.