Dismissal of Appeal in POCSO Case: Shambhu Yadav vs. State of Bihar.
18 June 2025
POCSO >> Criminal Law | Rape >> Criminal Law
The prosecution's case stemmed from an incident on June 4, 2018, when the victim's mother, Lalita Devi, discovered the accused sexually assaulting her one-and-a-half-year-old daughter. The mother's immediate actions and subsequent report led to the lodging of an FIR. Medical examination revealed perineal tear and abrasions around the anus of the victim, indicating recent sexual assault.
Throughout the trial, 13 prosecution witnesses, including the victim's parents and medical professionals, testified and remained steadfast despite extensive cross-examination. Defence witnesses attempted to introduce theories of injury by scratching or a land dispute, which were rejected by the courts.
Both the Trial Court and the High Court meticulously evaluated the evidence, concluding that the prosecution had established its case beyond a reasonable doubt. The High Court specifically noted the "horrendous act" committed by the accused, emphasizing that he deserved no leniency.
Section 4, Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act - 2012
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012
Section 376., Indian Penal Code - 1860