Divorce Jurisdiction Abroad: Wife Wins Case in Mumbai Court.


15 April 2024 Divorce Law >> Family Law  

A recent court case in India highlights the complexities of jurisdiction in divorce proceedings involving couples residing abroad. The wife successfully challenged the authority of a Mumbai family court to hear her husband's divorce petition.

Background:

The couple, married according to Hindu rites in Jodhpur, Rajasthan, held a reception in Mumbai before moving to the United States for work. After four years of cohabitation in the US, their marriage strained, leading to separation. The wife initiated divorce proceedings in the US, while the husband filed a petition in the Family Court, Bandra, Mumbai.

Wife Contests Jurisdiction:

The wife contested the Mumbai court's jurisdiction, arguing that their last residence together was in the US, not Mumbai. She pointed out the brief Mumbai stay after the wedding wasn't a true matrimonial home. Additionally, the husband's US-notarized petition further emphasized their foreign residence.

 

 

Husband's Defense:

The husband countered that Mumbai was their last residence in India before moving to the US. He argued that Section 19(iii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, allowing petitions to be filed where the parties last resided together, supported his case.

Court's Reasoning and Ruling:

The court, focusing on Section 19(iii), clarified that a brief post-wedding stay in Mumbai doesn't qualify as "last residence together." The couple's substantial cohabitation period in the US solidified their last residence there. The court also acknowledged the Hindu Marriage Act's applicability to Hindus domiciled in India, further strengthening the argument for US jurisdiction.

Relying on judgments like Kashmira Kale vs. Kishore kumar Mohan Kale (Bombay HC), which emphasized the importance of actual residence, the court dismissed the husband's arguments based on a technicality. The court also distinguished the husband's cited cases due to differing facts and legal principles.

Conclusion:

By upholding the wife's challenge, the court effectively denied jurisdiction to the Mumbai Family Court. This decision suggests that the divorce proceedings will likely take place in the US, the couple's last residence together.

This case underscores the importance of considering international factors in divorce proceedings, especially when couples reside outside their home country. Consulting legal professionals familiar with both domestic and international laws is crucial for navigating such complexities and ensuring a fair outcome.

  HINDU MARRIAGE ACT, 1955