Interim Protection Granted to Petitioner in Multi-State FIR Case Over Old Tweets.
23 June 2025
FIR >> Criminal Law | Writ Petition >> Criminal Law
The core of the petitioner's argument is that the FIRs are retaliatory, filed after a complaint against a social media influencer led to their arrest and subsequent release on bail. The earliest known FIRs against the petitioner are from Golfgreen PS (June 2, 2025) and Garden Reach PS (June 16, 2025). The petitioner's counsel states that the controversial tweets have since been deleted, and an apology video was also issued.
The petitioner is currently in judicial custody in connection with the Golfgreen PS case and was in police custody for ten days until July 1, 2025, in the Garden Reach PS case. Citing previous court orders on consolidating FIRs, the senior counsel requested interim protection from coercive action in other similar cases.
The court has issued notice, returnable on July 14, 2025, and has granted the petitioner liberty to serve the Standing Counsel for the concerned states and the Central Agency. Significantly, the court has granted an ad-interim measure, directing that no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner until the next hearing in connection with the mentioned FIRs/complaints or any similar ones that may be registered.
Section 79, BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA - 2023
Section 121, BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA - 2023
Section 152, BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA - 2023
Section 196, BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA - 2023
Section 298, BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA - 2023
Section 299, BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA - 2023
Section 302, BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA - 2023
Section 66, Information Technology Act - 2000
Section 67, Information Technology Act - 2000
Information Technology Act, 2000