19 April 2024 Evidence >> Criminal Law   |   Theft >> Criminal Law  

In a recent judgment, the Supreme Court of India overturned the robbery conviction of Hansraj, who was initially found guilty by both the trial court and the High Court. Hansraj was accused of stealing jewelry from Bhagu Bai in December 1998.

The prosecution argued that Hansraj robbed Bhagu Bai and the stolen ornaments were later recovered based on his confession. However, the Supreme Court found several issues with the prosecution's case.

Firstly, Bhagu Bai could not identify Hansraj in court, raising doubt about his involvement in the crime.

Secondly, the court deemed the recovery of the ornaments from Hansraj unreliable. Legally, specific procedures must be followed when collecting evidence based on a suspect's confession. In this case, the court determined these procedures were not properly followed.

Thirdly, the Supreme Court found the identification of the ornaments by Bhagu Bai to be suspicious. Bhagu Bai admitted in court that the police officers pointed out the ornaments to her during identification, raising concerns about the validity of the identification process.

Finally, the court noted a complete lack of any other evidence linking Hansraj to the crime.

Due to the absence of reliable evidence, the Supreme Court allowed Hansraj's appeal, acquitting him of the robbery charges.