11 June 2024 Bail and Antcipatory Bail >> Criminal Law   |   Evidence >> Criminal Law  

Three members of the Popular Front of India (PFI) were denied bail by a court in Mumbai after their appeals challenging the lower court's decision were dismissed. The men, referred to as Accused No. 3, 2, and 6, are facing serious charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAP Act) and the Indian Penal Code (IPC).

The prosecution alleges the accused conspired to overthrow the government and establish an Islamic State in India. Evidence presented includes statements from witnesses, electronic records seized from the accused' devices, and a document titled "Vision-2047" which allegedly outlines the PFI's plan to achieve this goal.

The defense argued that the charges were baseless and the "Vision-2047" document was a distant and unrealistic goal. They also pointed out that none of the accused had been charged with advocating for unlawful activity.

However, the court found enough reason to believe the accused were involved in a serious plot. They noted the interconnectedness of the evidence and the potential for witness tampering if the men were released on bail. The court also directed the lower court to prioritize the trial and attempt to reach a verdict within one year.

This case highlights the ongoing scrutiny of the PFI in India. The organization has been accused of radical Islam and ties to terrorism. The Indian government banned the PFI in September 2022.

  Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967    Indian Penal Code, 1860