Procedural Twist in NIA Case: Court Offers Remedy for Conspiracy Charge.


A recent Supreme Court decision has breathed new life into a case investigated by the National Investigation Agency (NIA) in Jammu and Kashmir. The case, involving charges of attempt to murder, conspiracy, and sedition, faced a hurdle due to a change in legal procedures implemented amidst the investigation. This article delves into the court's judgement, which navigates the complexities arising from this shift and offers the NIA a path forward in prosecuting the conspiracy charge.

Facts:

The crux of the issue stemmed from the authorization process for prosecuting certain offenses under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) applicable in Jammu and Kashmir in 1989 (CrPC-1989). CrPC-1989 mandated authorization from a designated authority for offenses like conspiracy, which the NIA, in this case, did not obtain before filing the chargesheet. Further complicating matters, the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act of 2019 (Act-2019) came into effect on October 31, 2019. This act repealed CrPC-1989 and introduced CrPC-1973 for the newly formed Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir.

 

 

The Court's Decision:

The Court acknowledged the challenges arising due to this shift in CrPC applicability. However, they upheld two key points:

  • Authorization Requirement Still Applies: Since the investigation was conducted under CrPC-1989, the authorization requirement under that code remains valid. The court ruled that CrPC-1973 cannot be applied retrospectively to this case.
  • Non-Compliance Can Be Cured: While the NIA did not obtain the authorization initially, the court deemed this a "curable defect." This means the NIA can still rectify the situation.

Conclusion:

The judgement sets aside the trial court's decision not to take cognizance for the conspiracy charge. This essentially allows the NIA to proceed with the prosecution for conspiracy, but only if they comply with the CrPC-1989 authorization requirement. The court has given the agency the opportunity to seek the necessary authorization. If the NIA obtains the authorization, the trial court can then proceed with taking cognizance and conducting the trial for the conspiracy offense, along with the other charges. The court's reasoning relied on the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation (Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019 (Order-2019). This order allows for continuation of investigations initiated under the repealed CrPC-1989. Additionally, the court cited a previous case to support its decision on allowing the NIA to cure the defect by obtaining authorization.

In a nutshell, the court has revived the conspiracy charge in this NIA case, but with the condition that the agency follows the proper authorization procedure under the CrPC applicable at the time of investigation.

  

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973    

Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967    

EXPLOSIVE SUBSTANCES ACT, 1908