Revisiting the Scope of Revisional Jurisdiction in Acquittal Appeals: The Case of Accidental Fire.
12-August-2025
Criminal Appeals & Suspension of Sentence >> Criminal Law
The High Court, however, set aside the acquittal, stating that the trial court had failed to properly consider a dying declaration made by the deceased. It then sent the case back to the trial court for a fresh review.

The appellants' counsel argued that the High Court exceeded its revisional jurisdiction by re-evaluating the evidence, which is typically not permitted. They contended that the dying declaration itself, when read in full, supported the defense's position that the fire was a tragic accident, not a deliberate act. The declaration mentioned that the deceased and her family suffered burn injuries because a gas regulator was left open overnight.
The counsel for the respondent (complainant) and the State, however, argued that the High Court was justified in its action, claiming the trial court had overlooked key evidence, including a statement from the deceased's father about prior harassment.
Section 109., Indian Penal Code - 1860
Section 306., Indian Penal Code - 1860
Section 498A., Indian Penal Code - 1860