Supreme Court Demands Explanation for 850-Day Delay in Appeal of Property Dispute.
26 September 2025
Property/Real Estate Law >> Property & Real Estate
The conflict arose when the petitioner instituted a civil suit in 2021 in the Madras High Court with several declarations, including that a General Power of Attorney in 2016 and a subsequent sale deed in 2017 were invalid. She also prayed for a permanent injunction to prevent the defendants from troubling or encumbering the suit property, along with a declaration of ownership in her name.
To that effect, the defendants filed a motion under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, requesting dismissal of the plaint, with an argument that the jurisdiction of the civil court was excluded by Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest (SARFAESI) Act, 2002.
The High Court's single judge accepted this plea, dismissed the plaint, and instructed the petitioner to approach the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) for relief. An appeal to a Division Bench was lodged, but that was done after a lapse of 850 days. The High Court declined to condone such inordinate delay on the grounds of no sufficient cause being made out by the petitioner.
The Court has listed the case for further hearing after the filing of the affidavit.
Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002