Supreme Court Quashes Dowry Case Against Father-in-Law After Divorce.
12-August-2025
Criminal Appeals & Suspension of Sentence >> Criminal Law
The marriage, solemnized in 2017, began to unravel by 2019. The couple sought counseling, but reconciliation failed, leading the wife to file a First Information Report (FIR) on July 21, 2019. She accused her husband and his family, including the appellant, of demanding dowry and physical and mental cruelty. A specific allegation against the father-in-law was that he had slapped her at a railway station and demanded a large sum of money.

The High Court had previously quashed the proceedings against the mother-in-law and sister-in-law, citing a lack of specific allegations, but it refused to do so for the father-in-law and the husband, noting specific accusations against them.
The Supreme Court, however, found several key issues with the case against the father-in-law. It noted that the FIR was filed almost two months after the alleged incident at the railway station and after the husband had initiated divorce proceedings. The court found it suspicious that these serious allegations were not raised during the prior police counseling sessions.
Ultimately, the Supreme Court exercised its power under Article 142 of the Constitution of India to "do complete justice" and quashed the FIR and all related criminal proceedings against the appellant (the father-in-law), concluding that further prosecution would only prolong bitterness and amount to an abuse of the legal process.
Section 498A., Indian Penal Code - 1860
Section 142, Constitution of India - 1950